CDL-INF(1997)006e
Strasbourg, 18 December 1997
OPINION ON THE DRAFT CONSTITUTION OF THE NAKHICHEVAN
AUTONOMOUS REPUBLIC (AZERBÄIJAN REPUBLIC)
prepared by a Working Group of the Venice Commission consisting
of:
Mr G. Malinverni (Switzerland)
Mr A. Suviranta (Finland)
Mr M. Lesage (France)
and approved by the Commission at its 33rd Plenary
Meeting
(Venice, 12 - 13 December 1997)
Introduction
On 27
September 1997, the Director of Administration of the President of the
Azerbaijan Republic submitted a request to the Council of Europe for its
opinion on the draft Constitution of the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic. For this purpose, a rapporteur group was set
up within the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice
Commission), consisting of MM Malinverni, Suviranta and Lesage. The Commission held an exchange of views
with the Rapporteurs during its 32nd plenary session (Venice, 16-17 October
1997) on the basis of their preliminary comments (CDL (97)45, 46 and 48
rev.). The Rapporteurs then met in
Brussels, on 31 October 1997, in the presence of Mr Hajiyev, President of the
Supreme Court and Associate member of the Commission for Azerbaijan and assisted
by Mr Giakoumopoulos, Deputy Secretary to the Commission. At the end of the meeting, the Rapporteurs
adopted the present Opinion which was approved by the Commission sitting in
plenary session, at its 33rd session (Venice, 12-13 December 1997).
1. The autonomy of the Nakhichevan Republic
The
status of the Autonomous Nakhichevan Republic, a territory which has no common
border with the rest of Azerbaijan, is determined by Chapter VIII (Art. 134) of
the Azerbaijan Constitution of 12 November 1995. It is "an autonomous state within the Azerbaijan Republic". In accordance with the International
Agreements concluded in Moscow and Kars in 1921, referred to in the Preamble
and Article 1 of the draft Constitution of the Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic:
- the Autonomous Republic
is not a separate legal entity in international law, but may have contacts with
foreign States and international organisations (See Article 37, paragraph 11 of the draft Constitution);
- the territory of the Autonomous
Republic is an integral part of the territory of the Azerbaijan Republic which
is "inviolable and indivisible" (Article 11 of the Constitution of
the Azerbaijan Republic);
- the Autonomous
Republic's powers are determined solely by the Constitution of the Azerbaijan
Republic, to the exclusion of any agreement between the Autonomous Republic and
Azerbaijan; furthermore, the provisions
of the Constitution of the Autonomous Republic may not be contrary to the
Constitution of the Azerbaijan Republic, which takes precedence over the
Nakhichevan Constitution (See Article 134 of the Constitution of the Azerbaijan
Republic). Similarly, Article 137
establishes that legislation passed by the Ali Majlis (the Parliament of
Nakhitchevan, "Supreme Assembly") must be compatible with the
Azerbaijan Constitution and with all legislation of the Azerbaijan
Republic. It is therefore clear that
the constituent power Assembly of the Azerbaijan Republic has the sovereign
power to determine the degree of autonomy granted to the Autonomous
Republic. The acts of the Autonomous
Republic's authorities in no way limit this power of the Azerbaijan Constituent
Assembly; in particular, the Nakhichevan
authorities' consent is not required in order to modify the rules governing
autonomy. The safeguard for these rules lies in the rigidity of the Azerbaijan
Constitution which may only be amended on the basis of a referendum (see
Chapter XI of the Azerbaijan Constitution).
On
the other hand, it should be noted that according to the Azerbaijan
Constitution, relatively important areas are the exclusive competence of the
Nakhichevan legislature. In this
regard, Article 138 of the Azerbaijan Constitution lists elections to the
Supreme Assembly, issues concerning economic development, social protection,
environmental protection, tourism, health, the sciences and culture. The Azerbaijan Constitution also grants the
legislature of the Autonomous Republic budgetary powers; Article 139 of the Azerbaijan Constitution
provides that the Supreme Assembly shall approve the Autonomous Nakhichevan
Republic's budget. The Azerbaijan
Republic also grants the Supreme Assembly tax-raising powers and the draft
Constitution of the Autonomous Republic (Article 29) specifies that the Supreme
Assembly is responsible for local taxes.
The
Republic of Nakhichevan therefore enjoys a considerable amount of autonomy.
2. Hierarchy of standards and monitoring of constitutionality
Both
Azerbaijan national legislation and the Autonomous Republic's own legislation
are applicable on the territory of the Autonomous Republic. Articles 135, paragraphs 4 and 5 of the
Azerbaijan Constitution and Article 61 of the draft Constitution of the
Autonomous Republic determine the hierarchical relationship between the provisions.
The
Constitutional Court of the Azerbaijan Republic has the power to determine
whether legal acts of the Autonomous Republic are in conformity with those of
the Azerbaijan Republic (Article 130, paragraph 3.8). However, neither the Azerbaijan Constitution nor the draft
Nakhichevan Constitution refer to the monitoring of conformity of the
Autonomous Nakhichevan Republic's standards with its Constitution.
It
would be advisable to use the appropriate procedures to attribute this power to
the Azerbaijan Constitutional Court.
3. Human rights
The
Rapporteurs note that, in accordance with Article 71 of the Azerbaijan
Constitution, the rights and freedoms of individuals and of citizens are
directly applicable on the territory of the Autonomous Nakhichevan
Republic. This could be stated in the
Constitution of the Autonomous Republic.
Since
the Azerbaijan Constitution contains comprehensive guarantees of human rights,
it might seem superfluous to include in the Constitution of the Azerbaijan
Republic a provision concerning only the right to property but it can be
justified on historical grounds. In any
case, if a special provision on this right is incorporated into the Azerbaijan
Constitution, it would be wise to emphasise that the right to own property may
be subject to restrictions and limitations;
Article 1 of Protocol N°1 to the European Convention on Human Rights and also
Article 29 of the Azerbaijan Constitution could be used as a model in this
regard.
4. Separation of powers - the duties and powers of the
President of the Supreme Assembly
Article
5 of the draft Constitution of the Autonomous Nakhichevan Republic states that
the President of the Ali Medjlis is the Republic's highest official; among other duties, he or she is responsible
for representing the Republic abroad and for ensuring state succession in the
Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic.
Article 37 also lists the competences of the President of the Ali
Medjlis (Parliament).
Taken
together, Articles 5 and 37 result in a concentration of competences in the
President of the Ali Medjlis which is difficult to reconcile with the principle
of the separation of powers enshrined in Article 3 of the draft Constitution. The Autonomous Republic's Head of State
cannot promote cooperation between the executive, the legislature and the
judiciary unless he or she is outside and above them; this is not the case of the President of the Ali Medjlis who is
also President of the legislature.
Article 37 of the draft Constitution lists the competences of the Ali
Medjlis which include not only duties relating to the legislature but also
functions which traditionally fall to the executive. For example, the President of the Ali Medjlis establishes Central
Executive Authorities (paragraph 9), suspends resolutions and decrees of the
Cabinet of Ministers (paragraph 10), represents the Republic (paragraph 11),
deprives members of the Ali Medjlis of their credentials where necessary
(paragraph 12), appoints working groups with a view to preparing drafts of laws
and decrees (paragraph 13) and presents proposals for the nomination and
dismissal of judges and public prosecutors (paragraphs 16 and 17).
The
duties of the President of the Ali Medjlis should therefore be reconsidered, in
particular the following provisions of Article 37:
- paragraph 3 which
states that the President of the Ali Medjlis shall "promote
cooperation" among the various State bodies;
- the provision contained
in paragraph 10 which states that the President of the Ali Medjlis may suspend
certain decisions of both central and local executive authorities; in fact, the President must ask the
judiciary to suspend the effect of the decisions concerned; moreover, only courts should be able to declare
such decisions void;
- paragraph 23 which
apparently repeats paragraph 14 (power of the President to adopt decisions and
resolutions);
- paragraph 18 which
states that the President shall appoint the head of the Central Bank of the
Nakhichevan Autonomous Republic and paragraphs 19, 26, 27, 28 and 29 which
state that the President shall implement the military doctrine of the
Azerbaijan Republic, set up and head the Security Council, be responsible for
declaring a general mobilisation, take the decision to call up citizens for
military service and ensure the implementation of a state of emergency or
martial law: all these duties
traditionally belong to the executive.
-paragraphs 16 and 17 which give the President of the
Ali Medjlis the authority to make proposals for the appointment and dismissal
of judges and public prosecutors
(see point 6 below).
5. Functioning of the legislature
Some
provisions are such as to diminish parliamentary sovereignty. For example, the Ali Medjlis is authorised
to amend draft laws submitted to it only with the consent of the body
exercising the right of legislative initiative (Article 31, paragraph 3 of the
draft).
According
to the Rapporteurs, the legislature must remain free to adopt and amend laws,
without being subject to the opinion of the bodies which initiated the law
concerned.
The
provision whereby the Ali Medjlis must adopt a law within one month from the
day on which the draft law was submitted to it (Article 31, paragraph 4) also
limits parliamentary sovereignty. The
Ali Medjlis should have as much time as it considers necessary to legislate.
6. The independence and functioning of the judiciary
While
the appointment of judges by the Ali Medjlis on the basis of proposals by its
President is a normal procedure, granting the latter the right to propose the
dismissal of judges of the Supreme Court (Article 51, paragraph 2) and of the
Economic Court (Article 52, paragraph 2) is a serious distortion of the
principles of judicial independence and of the separation of powers.
These
provisions are also contrary to Article 128 of the Azerbaijan Constitution
which, in its final paragraph, determines the procedure for dismissing judges
in Azerbaijan.
In addition,
Article 53 which empowers the Public Prosecutor's Office to undertake
investigations and bring criminal proceedings, may raise serious problems in
respect of the requirement of the European Convention on Human Rights that the
judicial body responsible for carrying out an investigation should demonstrate
its independence and impartiality. This
requirement has been interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights in
particular in the following judgements:
Schiesser v. Switzerland of 4 December 1979 (A Series, n°34), Huber v. Switzerland of 23 October 1990 (A
Series, n°188) and Brincat v. Italy of 26 November 1992 (A
Series, n°249-A).
Lastly,
granting the Supreme Court the power to supervise the activities of the general
courts (Article 51, paragraph 1) would seem to be contrary to the principle of
the independence of such general courts.
While the Supreme Court must have the authority to set aside, or to
modify, the judgements of lower courts, it should not supervise them.
7. Conclusion
The Rapporteurs
consider that the draft Constitution, taken as a whole, constitutes a sound
basis for determining the rules governing autonomy in Nakhichevan.
The
failure to distinguish between the duties of the Head of State and the
President of the Ali Medjlis and to attribute them to a single individual and
the concentration of important powers in the hands of this one individual
raises problems in respect of the separation of powers.
Some
provisions of the draft infringe the sovereignty of the legislature, which is
deprived of its power to freely amend drafts which are submitted to it.
Similarly,
infringements of judicial independence are incompatible with the fundamental
principles of a democratic State which respects human rights and the rule of
law: they should therefore be removed
from the draft.