|
Strasbourg, 22 February 2002
|
Restricted
CDL (2002) 18 rev
Or. eng.
|
|
|
|
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW
(VENICE COMMISSION)
COMMENTS ON THE law
on the election OF MEMBERS
of the representative bodies
of local and regional self-government units
of croatia
by:
Mr
Franz MATSCHER
(Member,
Austria)
General comments
1. The comments by Pieter van Dijk contain
a list of the relevant documents to be taken into account when commenting on
the present matter. As a general background I would like to add the study
elaborated by the Venice Commission on “Electoral Law and National Minorities”
(CDL-INF (2000) 4 of 25 January 2000) where the impact of electoral systems on
the representation of minorities in public life, as an aspect of their
protection, has been emphasised.
2. For these purposes the system governing
sub-national (regional, local) elections is of the utmost importance as many
policies that are relevant to minorities are within the competence of the
sub-national bodies and institutions. In this respect I fully agree with the
general comments by Christof Hartmann.
3. The present comments refrain from
repeating the observations by Pieter van Dijk and Christof Hartmann to the
extent that I am in agreement with them.
4. As a further general remark I would
like to add that, even if the law under consideration does not refer expressly
to minorities, it is clear that, for the reasons explained above, in areas of
the state where members of the minority are living, in particular where they
are concentrated, the electoral system governing regional and local elections
is one of the most important factors for their representation in public life,
as an aspect of their protection. Therefore I ask myself whether the system of
double representation governing the elections at the State level, as provided
for by the Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in Croatia
should not be envisaged for the elections at the regional and the local level too.
Of course, the practicability and the appropriateness of this idea would need
deeper consideration.
Some specific comments
As to Articles 2, 9 and 23
5. The limitation of the right to vote for
regional and local elections to Croatian citizens is not in line with the
general tendency in modern Europe to grant the right to vote to foreigners
having residence there for a considerable period of time (not necessarily
permanent residence or domicile within the meaning of various laws). This
regulation is particularly problematic in the context of present Croatia in
view of the situation of the numerous refugees, especially Serbs, who have not
yet acquired the new Croatian citizenship, and it does not facilitate their
integration, which is one of the most burning problems of the country.
6. There is also the problem that,
following a decision of the Constitutional Court of Croatia, ethnic Croats
living in Bosnia and Herzegovina and having dual citizenship are allowed to
vote for local government elections in Croatia. But this is not a specific
problem of the Local Elections Law; it seems rather to be founded on the
Constitution itself. Anywhere, the interpretation of the terms “permanent
residence in the area” in Article 2 would deserve a clarification in order to
avoid falsification of the results of local elections.
As to other Articles of the Law
7. Concerning various articles Pieter van
Dijk raises a series of rather technical and legalistic questions. I agree with
him when he says that the relevant provisions should be redrafted in order to
render them more consistent, to fill up existing lacunae and to avoid possible
misunderstandings.
8. The suggested reconsideration of the
various issues addressed in the present opinions would be as easier as the Law
of 6 April 2001 seems to be intended – at least partly (see Article 61) – to
regulate the 2001 elections only.
9. When redrafting the Law the suggestions
made by the Venice Commission in its opinion on the “Constitutional Law on the
Rights of National Minorities in Croatia” should also be taken into
consideration.