|
Strasbourg, 13 September 2006
Study no.
371 / 2006
|
Restricted
CDL-EL(2006)024rev
Or. Fr.
|
|
|
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW
(VENICE COMMISSION)
DRAFT
GUIDELINES ON REFERENDUM
on the basis of contributions
by
Mr François LUCHAIRE (Member, Andorra)
Mr Giorgio MALINVERNI
(Member, Switzerland)
Mr Pieter VAN DIJK (Member,
the Netherlands)
I. Referendums and Europe'selectoral heritage
1. Universal suffrage
1.1. Rule
and exceptions
Universal
suffrage means in principle that all human beings have the right to vote. This
right may, however, and indeed should, be subject to certain conditions:
the right to vote must be subject to a minimum age but must be
acquired, at the latest, at the age of majority;
i. a nationality requirement may
apply;
ii. however, it would be
advisable for foreigners to be allowed to vote in local elections after a
certain period of residence.
i. a residence requirement may be imposed;
ii. residence in this case means habitual residence;
iii. a length of residence requirement may be imposed on nationals
solely for local or regional elections;
iv. the requisite period of residence should be reasonable and, as a
rule, should not exceed six months;
v. it is desirable that the right to vote be accorded to citizens
residing abroad.
i. provision
may be made for depriving individuals of their right to vote, but only subject
to the following cumulative conditions:
ii. it must be provided for by law;
iii. the proportionality principle must be observed;
iv. the deprivation must be
based on mental incapacity or a criminal conviction for a serious offence.
v. furthermore, the withdrawal of political rights or finding of mental
incapacity may only be imposed by express decision of a court of law.
1.2. Electoral registers
Fulfilment of the following criteria is essential if electoral
registers are to be reliable:
i. electoral registers must be permanent or refer to a register that
is constantly updated (population register or register of births, marriages and
deaths);
ii. there must be regular up-dates, at least
once a year. Where voters are not registered automatically, registration must
be possible over a relatively long period;
iii.
electoral registers must be public;
iv. there
should be an administrative procedure - subject to judicial control - or a
judicial procedure, allowing for the registration of a voter who was not
registered; the registration should not take place as a result of a decision
taken by the polling station on election day;
v. a similar
procedure should allow voters to have incorrect inscriptions amended within
a reasonable time;
vi. provision may be made for a supplementary register as a means of
giving the vote to persons who have moved or reached statutory voting age since
final publication of the register.
2. Equal suffrage
2.1. Equal voting rights
Each voter has in principle one
vote; where the electoral system provides voters with more than one vote (for
example, where there are alternatives), each voter has the same number of
votes.
2.2. Equality
of opportunity
a. Equality of opportunity must be guaranteed for
the supporters and opponents of the proposal being voted on. This entails a
neutral attitude by state authorities, in particular with regard to:
i. the
referendum campaign;
ii. coverage
by the media, in particular by the publicly owned media;
iii. public
funding of parties and campaigns;
iv. billposting and advertising;
v. the right to demonstrate on public
thoroughfares.
b. In public radio and television
broadcasts on the referendum campaign, it is
preferable that equality be ensured between the proposal’s supporters
and opponents rather then between political parties.
c. Balanced coverage must be guaranteed to the
proposal's supporters and opponents in other public mass media broadcasts,
especially news broadcasts. Account
may be taken of the number of political parties supporting each option or their
election results.
d. Equality
must be ensured in terms of public subsidies and other forms of backing. It is preferable that equality be ensured
between the proposal's supporters and opponents rather than between
political parties. Such backing may,
however, be restricted to supporters and opponents of the proposal who
account for a minimum percentage of the electorate. If equality is
ensured between political parties, it may be strict or proportional. If it
is strict, political parties are treated on an equal footing irrespective of
their current parliamentary strength or support among the electorate. If it is
proportional, political parties must be treated according to the results
achieved in the elections.
e. Financial or other conditions for radio and
television advertising must be the same for the proposal's supporters and
opponents.
f.
In conformity with freedom of expression, legal provision should be made to
ensure that there is a minimum access to privately owned audiovisual media,
with regard to the referendum campaign and to advertising, for all participants
in the referendum.
g.
Political party and referendum campaign funding must be transparent.
h.
The principle of equality of opportunity can, in certain cases, lead to a
limitation of spending by political parties and other parties involved in the
referendum debate, especially on advertising.
i. Sanctions must be imposed in the case of
breaches of the duty of neutrality.
2.3. Equality
and national minorities
a. Special
rules providing for a proportional exception to the normal vote-counting rules
in the case of a referendum concerning the situation of national minorities
do not in principle run counter to equal suffrage (text on reserved seats
deleted).
b. Voters must not
find themselves obliged to reveal their membership of a national minority.
3. Free suffrage
3.1. Freedom
of voters to form an opinion
a. State
authorities must observe their duty of neutrality (see 1.2.2.a. above),
which is one of the means of ensuring that voters can form an opinion freely.
b. Contrary to
the case of elections, it is not necessarily to prohibit completely
intervention by the authorities in support of or against the proposal submitted
to a referendum. However, the national,
regional and local authorities must not influence the outcome of the vote by
excessive, one-sided campaigning. The
use of public funds by the authorities for campaigning purposes must be
prohibited.
c. The
question put to the vote must be clear; it must not be misleading; it must not
suggest an answer; electors must be informed of the effects of the referendum;
voters must be able to answer the questions asked solely by yes, no or a
blank vote.
d. The
authorities must provide objective information.
This implies that the text submitted to a referendum and an explanatory
report or balanced campaign material from the proposal's supporters and
opponents should be made available to electors sufficiently in advance, as
follows:
i. they must
be published in the official gazette sufficiently far in advance of the
vote;
ii. they must
be sent directly to citizens and be received sufficiently far in advance
of the vote;
iii. the
explanatory report must give a balanced presentation not only of the viewpoint of the executive and legislative
authorities or persons sharing their viewpoint but also of the opposing
one.
e. The above
information must be available in all the official languages and in the
languages of the national minorities.
f. Sanctions
must be imposed in the case of breaches of the duty of neutrality and of voters'
freedom to form an opinion.
3.2. Freedom
of voters to express their wishes and action to combat fraud
a. Voting
procedure
i. voting procedures must be readily understandable by citizens;
ii. voters
should always have the possibility of voting in a polling station. Other means
of voting are acceptable under the following conditions:
iii. postal
voting should be allowed only where the postal service is safe and reliable;
the right to vote using postal votes may be confined to people who are in hospital
or imprisoned or to persons with reduced mobility or to electors residing
abroad; fraud and intimidation must not be possible;
iv. electronic
voting should be in conformity with Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation
Rec(2004)11 on Legal, operational and technical standards for e-voting. In
particular, it should be used only if it is safe, reliable, efficient,
technically robust, open to independent verification and easily accessible to
voters; the system must be transparent; unless channels of remote electronic
voting are universally accessible, they shall be only an additional and
optional means of voting;
v. very strict
rules must apply to voting by proxy; the number of proxies a single voter may
hold must be limited;
vi. mobile
ballot boxes should only be allowed under strict conditions that avoid all
risks of fraud;
vii. at least
two criteria should be used to assess the accuracy of the outcome of the
ballot: the number of votes cast and the number of voting slips placed in the
ballot box;
viii. voting
slips must not be tampered with or marked in any way by polling station
officials;
ix. unused and invalid voting slips must never leave the polling
station;
x. polling
stations must include representatives of a number of parties, and the presence
of observers appointed by the latter or by other groups that have taken a
stand on the issue put to the vote must be permitted during voting and
counting;
xi. military
personnel should vote at their place of residence whenever possible. Otherwise,
it is advisable that they be registered to vote at the polling station nearest
to their duty station;
xii. counting should preferably take place in polling stations;
xiii. counting
must be transparent. Observers, representatives of the proposal's supporters
and opponents and the media must be allowed to be present. These persons
must also have access to the records;
xiv. results must be transmitted to the higher level in an open manner;
xv. the state must punish any kind of electoral fraud.
b. Freedom of voters to express
their wishes also implies:
i. that the
executive must organise referendums provided for by the legislative system;
this is particularly important when it has not called a referendum;
ii. compliance
with the procedural rules; in particular, referendums must be held within the
time-limit prescribed by law;
iii. the right
to accurate establishment of the result by the body responsible for
organising the referendum, in a transparent manner, and formal publication
in the official gazette.
4. Secret suffrage
a. For the voter, secrecy of
voting is not only a right but also a duty, non-compliance with which must be
punishable by disqualification of any ballot paper whose content is disclosed.
b. Voting must be individual.
Family voting and any other form of control by one voter over the vote of
another must be prohibited.
c. The list of persons actually
voting should not be published.
d. The violation of secret
suffrage should be sanctioned.
II. Conditions for implementing these principles
1. Respect for fundamental rights
a. Democratic referendums are not
possible without respect for human rights, in particular freedom of expression
and of the press, freedom of movement inside the country, freedom of assembly
and freedom of association for political purposes, including freedom to set up
political parties.
b. Restrictions on these freedoms
must have a basis in law, be in the public interest and comply with the
principle of proportionality.
2. Regulatory levels and stability of
referendum law
a. Apart from rules on technical
matters and detail (which may be included in regulations of the executive),
rules of referendum law should have at least the rank of a statute.
b. The fundamental aspects of
referendum law should not be open to amendment less than one year before a
referendum, or should be written in the Constitution or at a level higher than
ordinary law.
c. Fundamental rules include, in particular,
those concerning:
- the composition of electoral commissions or any other body
responsible for organising the referendum;
- the franchise and electoral registers;
- the procedural and substantive validity of the text put to a
referendum;
- the effects of the referendum (with the exception of rules
concerning matters of detail).
3. Procedural guarantees
3.1. Organisation of the
referendum by an impartial body
a. An
impartial body must be in charge of organising the referendum.
b. Where there
is no longstanding tradition of administrative authorities' impartiality in
electoral matters, independent, impartial electoral commissions must be set
up at all levels, from the national level to polling station level.
c. The central
commission must be permanent in nature.
d. It should
include:
i. at least one member of the judiciary or other independent legal
expert;
ii.
representatives of parties already in Parliament or having scored at least a
given percentage of the vote; these persons must be qualified in referendum
matters.
It may include:
iii. a representative of the Ministry of the Interior;
iv. representatives of national minorities.
e. Political
parties or supporters and opponents of the proposal put to the vote must
be equally represented on electoral commissions or must be able to observe the
work of the impartial body. Equality between political parties may be construed
strictly or on a proportional basis (see I.2.2.d.).
f. The bodies
appointing members of commissions must not be free to dismiss them at will.
g. Members of commissions
must receive standard training.
h. It is
desirable that commissions take decisions by a qualified majority or by
consensus.
3.2. Observation
of the referendum
a. Both
national and international observers should be given the widest possible
opportunity to participate in a referendum observation exercise.
b. Observation
must not be confined to election day itself, but must include the referendum
campaign and, where appropriate, the voter registration period and the
signature collection period. It must make it possible to determine whether
irregularities occurred before, during or after the vote. It must always be
possible during vote counting.
c. Observers
should be able to go everywhere where operations connected with the referendum
are taking place (for example, vote counting and verification). The places
where observers are not entitled to be present should be clearly specified by
law, with the reasons for their being banned.
d. Observation
should cover respect by the authorities of their duty of neutrality.
3.3. An
effective system of appeal
a. The appeal
body in referendum matters should be either an electoral commission or a court.
In any case, final appeal to a court must be possible.
b. The
procedure must be simple and devoid of formalism, in particular where the
admissibility of appeals is concerned.
c. The appeal
procedure and, in particular, the powers and responsibilities of the various
bodies should be clearly regulated by law, so as to avoid conflicts of
jurisdiction (whether positive or negative). The law must specifically
designate the competent body in each case.
d. The
appeal body must be competent to deal with the sphere covered by these
guidelines, in particular with:
- the
franchise and electoral registers;
- the
completion of popular initiatives and requests for referendums from a section of
the electorate;
- the
procedural and, where applicable, substantive validity of texts submitted to a
referendum, which should be subjected to preliminary review: domestic law
determines whether such review is obligatory or optional; the review of the validity
of texts should take place before the vote;
- respect
for free suffrage:
- the
results of the ballot.
e. The appeal
body must have authority to annul the referendum where irregularities may have
affected the outcome. It must be
possible to annul the entire referendum or merely the results for one polling
station or constituency. In the event of annulment, a new referendum
must be called.
f. All voters
must be entitled to appeal. A reasonable quorum may be imposed for appeals by
voters against the results of a referendum.
g. Time-limits
for lodging and deciding appeals must be short.
h. The
applicant’s right to a hearing involving both parties must be protected.
i. Where the
appeal body is a higher electoral commission, it must be able ex officio to rectify or set aside
decisions taken by lower electoral commissions.
3.4. Funding
a. The general
rules on the funding of political parties and referendum campaigns must be
applied to both public and private funding.
b. In contrast
to elections, the use of public funds by the authorities for campaigning
purposes need not be strictly prohibited in all cases; however, it must be
restricted.
III. Specific rules
1. The rule of law
The use of referendums must
comply with the legal system as a whole, and especially the procedural rules.
In particular, referendums cannot be held if the Constitution does not provide
for them, for example where the text submitted to a referendum is a
matter for Parliament's exclusive jurisdiction.
2. The procedural validity of texts submitted
to a referendum
Questions submitted to a
referendum must respect:
- unity of form: the same
question must not combine a specifically-worded draft amendment with a
generally-worded proposal or a question of principle;
- unity of content: except
in the case of total revision of a text (Constitution, law), there must be an
intrinsic connection between the various parts of each question put to the
vote, in order to guarantee the free suffrage of the voter, who must not be
called to accept or refuse as a whole provisions without an intrinsic link; the
revision of several chapters of a text at the same time is equivalent to a
total revision;
- unity of hierarchical level:
it is desirable that the same question should not simultaneously apply to
legislation of different hierarchical levels.
3. The substantive validity of
texts submitted to a referendum
Texts submitted to a
referendum must comply with all higher law (principle of the hierarchy
of law).
They must not be contrary
to international law or to the Council of Europe's statutory principles
(democracy, human rights and the rule of law).
Texts submitted to a
constitutional referendum must abide by the substantive limits (intrinsic and
extrinsic) of constitutional reform.
Texts that contradict the
requirements mentioned under III.2 and III.3 may not be put to the popular
vote.
4. Specific rules applicable to
referendums held at the request of a section of the electorate and to popular
initiatives (where they are provided for in the Constitution).
a. Everyone enjoying political rights is
entitled to sign a popular initiative or request for a referendum.
b. The time-limit for collecting signatures
(particularly the day on which the time-limit starts to run and the last day of
the time-limit) must be clearly specified, as well as the number of signatures
to be collected.
c. Everyone (regardless of whether he or she
enjoys political rights) must be entitled to collect signatures.
d. If authorisation is required in order to gather
signatures for popular initiatives or requests for a referendum on
public thoroughfares, such authorisation may be refused only in specific cases provided
for by law, on the basis of overriding public interest and in accordance
with the principle of equality.
e. Payment from private sources for the
collection of signatures for popular initiatives and requests for
referendums [should, as a rule, be prohibited.
If permitted, it] must be regulated, with regard to both the total
amount allocated and the amount paid to each person.
f. All signatures must be checked. In order to facilitate checking, lists of
signatures should preferably contain the names of electors registered in the
same municipality.
g. In order to avoid having to declare a vote
totally invalid, an authority must have the power, prior to the vote, to
correct faulty drafting, for example:
i. when the question is obscure,
misleading or suggestive;
ii. when rules on procedural or substantive
validity have been violated; in this event, partial invalidity may be declared
if the remaining text is coherent; sub-division may be envisaged to correct a
lack of substantive unity.
5. Parallelism in procedures and rules
governing the referendum
a.
When the referendum is legally binding:
i. For a certain period of time, a text that has
been rejected in a referendum may not be adopted by a procedure without
referendum.
ii. During the same period of time, a provision
that has been accepted in a referendum may not be revised by another method.
iii. The above does not apply in the case of a
referendum on partial revision of a text, where the previous referendum
concerned a total revision.
iv. The revision of a rule of higher law that is
contrary to the popular vote is not legally unacceptable but should be avoided
during the above-mentioned period.
v. In the event of rejection of a text adopted
by Parliament and put to the popular vote at the request of a section of the
electorate, a similar new text must not be put to the vote unless a referendum
is requested.
b. When a text is
adopted by referendum at the request of a section of the electorate, it should
be possible to organise a further referendum on the same issue at the request
of a section of the electorate, after the expiry, where applicable, of a period
of time laid down by law.
c. When a text is
adopted by referendum at the request of an authority other than Parliament, it
should be possible to revise it either by parliamentary means or by referendum,
at the request of Parliament or a section of the electorate, after the expiry,
where applicable, of the same period of time.
d. Constitutional
rules providing for referendums should be put to a referendum, compulsorily or
at the request of a section of the electorate.
6. Opinion of Parliament
When a text is put to the vote at
the request of a section of the electorate or an authority other than
Parliament, Parliament must be able to give a non-binding opinion on the
text put to the vote. In the case of the popular initiatives, it may be
entitled to put forward a counter-proposal to the proposed text, which will
be put the popular vote at the same time. A deadline must be set for
Parliament to give its opinion: if this deadline is not met, the text will be
put to the popular vote without Parliament's opinion.
7. Quorum
It is admissible for acceptance
by a minimum percentage of registered voters (approval quorum) to be
required in order for a referendum to be valid. This type of quorum is
preferable to a participation quorum (minimum turnout). Provision may be
made whereby the quorum is applicable only if the text put to the vote
has not been approved by Parliament.
8. Effects of referendums
a. The
effects of legally binding or consultative referendums must be clearly
specified in the Constitution or by law.
b. Referendums
on questions of principle or other generally-worded proposals should preferably
not be binding. If they are binding, the subsequent procedure should be laid
down in specific rules.