Venice Commission      Council of Europe
Council of Europe - Conseil de l'Europe Council of Europe - Conseil de l'Europe Home
The Commission
Presentation
Constitutional assistance
Constitutional justice
Elections and referendums, political parties
Members
Events
Focus
Calendar
Newsletter
SGs Conference
UniDem Campus
World Conference
Documents
Opinions
Studies
Recent documents
Access by:
Publications
Search
Web Resources
CODICES database
VOTA database
Library
Links
Photo Gallery
Restricted access
Click here to return to the normal version of this page
Related documents :
[18/01/2007] CDL-AD(2007)001  Report on Non-citizens and Minority Rights adopted by the Venice Commission at its 69th plenary session (Venice, 15-16 December 2006)  PDF
[18/01/2007] CDL-AD(2007)001  Rapport sur les non-ressortissants et les droits des minorités adopté par la Commission de Venise lors de sa 69e session plénière (Venise, 15-16 décembre 2006)  PDF
[29/11/2006] CDL-MIN(2006)002rev  Draft Report on Non-citizens and Minority Rights  PDF
[03/10/2006] CDL-MIN(2006)002  Draft Report on Non-citizens and Minority Rights  PDF
[03/10/2006] CDL-MIN(2006)004  Proposal for conclusions to the Draft Report on Non-citizens and Minority Rights in the light of the proposal for conclusions by Mr Franz Matscher  PDF
[20/06/2006] CDL(2006)055  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights" (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Report  PDF
[20/06/2006] CDL(2006)056  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights” (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Report  PDF
[12/06/2006] CDL(2006)054  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights” (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Which Minority Rights can be restricted to citizens?  PDF
[07/06/2006] CDL(2006)053  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights" (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Report  PDF
[02/06/2006] CDL(2006)052  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights” (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Identification, relevance and admissibility of criteria other than citizenship  PDF
[27/04/2006] CDL(2006)031prog  Round Table on “Non-citizens and Minority Rights” (Geneva, 16 June 2006): Draft programme  PDF
[06/06/2005] CDL-MIN(2005)001  Non-Citizens and Minority Rights - Background information and issues for discussion  PDF
[27/05/2004] CDL(2004)035prog Meeting on “Reflection on the definition of “Minority” – The citizenship requirement” (Strasbourg, 28 May 2004): Programme
[27/05/2004] CDL(2004)035list Meeting on “Reflection on the Definition of “Minority” – The citizenship requirement” (Strasbourg, 28 May 2004): List of participants

 

 

Strasbourg, 3 October 2006



Study no. 294/ 2004

Restricted
CDL-MIN(2006)003
Engl. only

 

 

 

EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW

(VENICE COMMISSION)

 

 

 

 

 

PROPOSAL FOR CONCLUSIONS

TO THE DRAFT REPORT

ON NON-CITIZENS AND MINORITY RIGHTS[1]

 

 

ADDITIONS AND AMENDMENTS

 

by

 

Mr Franz Matscher (Expert, Austria)

 

 

 

The following paragraphs could be added to the conclusions of the draft report on “Non-Citizens and Minority Rights” (CDL-MIN(2006)002):

 

Nevertheless, a definition of the term “minority” is unavoidable to indicate the beneficiaries of the protection system.

 

This is clear as far as the national and most of the bilateral instruments are concerned. Each one of these instruments has its own concept of “minority” and of the minority rights it provides.

 

Multilateral instruments, like Article 27 ICCPR and the FCNM may use larger notions for their purposes. Furthermore, these instruments do not contain in legally binding terms a universal notion of the concept of minorities.

 

Of course, de lege ferenda, one may speculate on a larger notion, but the idea of scholars or the opinion of experts or advisory bodies do not have, as such, a binding legal value.

 

Under these circumstances, we may very well argue whether it would be advisable to use the citizenship requirement or to replace (or combine) it by (with) another criterion, like the long lasting residence.

 

But all of these considerations move on the level of legal politics. This is true for the present report too.

 

Should the above-mentioned paragraphs be included in the conclusions, certain changes would have to be made earlier in the text (in particular in §§ 19, 40, 83, 93, 103, 107, 113) so as to put the reasoning in conformity with the conclusions.

 

 

 



[1]               CDL-MIN(2006)002.

Top of the page Disclaimer