|
FINAL
DECLARATION
On 22-24
January 2009, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of South Africa and the
Venice Commission of the Council of Europe hosted the World Conference on
Constitutional Justice on the topic “Influential Constitutional Justice - its
influence on society and on developing a global jurisprudence on human rights”
in Cape Town. This event coincided with the 60th anniversary of the
Council of Europe and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The organisers
are grateful for the support of the Ministry for Justice and Constitutional
Development of South Africa, the Government of Norway and the North South Centre
of the Council of Europe. The organisers would also like to acknowledge the
significant role played by the regional and linguistic groups in the preparation
of the Conference, in particular during the preparatory meetings held in
Vilnius, Seoul and Algiers.
Participants
from 93 Constitutional Courts, Constitutional Councils and Supreme Courts with
constitutional, including human rights jurisdiction participated in this
Conference.
The World
Conference brought together for the first time Courts and Councils, which belong
to the following various regional or linguistic groups:
• Asian
Constitutional Courts
• the
Association of Constitutional Courts using the French Language (ACCPUF)
•
Commonwealth Courts
• the
Conference of Constitutional Control Organs of Countries of Young Democracy (CCCOCYD)
• the
Conference of European Constitutional Courts (CECC)
• the
Ibero-American Conference on Constitutional Justice (CIJC)
• the
Southern African Judges Commission (SAJC)
• the
Union of Arab Constitutional Courts and Councils (UACCC)
•
the group of Portuguese-speaking Courts.
The World
Conference concluded that constitutional justice is a key element in fostering
and deepening the basic values enshrined
in the Constitutions that form the basis of the work of the Courts and Councils
which participated in the World Conference. Their decisions have a decisive
impact on society.
The participants of the
Conference underlined the paramount importance of the respect for human rights in
all parts of the World and insisted that governments must implement
international human rights instruments.
The
presentations and discussions at the World Conference showed a common concern
for the defence of human rights and the rule of law, both on a regional and a
global level. One element identified as being at the heart of this
jurisprudential trend is the unifying force of the Universal Declaration on
Human Rights and the UN Covenants. Other elements are the decisions of regional
Courts such as the European Court of Human Rights, the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights or the African Court of Human Rights. Mutual inspiration is also
increasingly drawn from the case-law of peer Courts of other countries and even
other continents, which gives rise to cross-fertilisation between the Courts on
a worldwide scale. While constitutions differ, the basic principles underlying
them, in particular the protection of human rights and human dignity and respect
for the Constitution and the rule of law, form a common ground. Legal reasoning
in respect of the application of these principles in one country can be a source
of inspiration in another country, notwithstanding the differences in their
Constitutions.
Consequently,
the exchange of information and experience between the Courts and Councils
should be reinforced on a regional and global basis. The participants of the
World Conference endorse and support the regional and linguistic groups and call
upon their members to use the tools for exchange of information and experience
provided by the Venice Commission, notably the CODICES database (www.CODICES.coe.int)
and the on-line Venice Forum.
The
participants agreed on the value of the present World Conference. They entrusted
a Bureau, composed of the Presidents of the regional groups and the three Courts
which hosted the preparatory meetings, assisted by the Venice Commission, with
the goal of organising a second World Conference on Constitutional Justice
within three years. The Bureau is also entrusted with making proposals for the
establishment of a World Association open to the Courts belonging to the
regional or linguistic groups.
|